Abstract:

Defining who qualifies as a "heritage speaker" remains a persistent challenge, as definitions vary across academic, social, and political contexts and often fail to reflect the linguistic and cultural realities of heritage speakers, especially in educational contexts. Building on Carreira’s (2004) assertion that no single definition is universally applicable, this study argues for a more flexible, experience-based understanding of heritage speakers’ identities. Drawing on in-depth interviews with 55 students enrolled in Spanish as a Heritage Language (SHL) courses at a large Hispanic-Serving institution in the US Southwest, we explore how ethnic, cultural, and linguistic self-identifications intersect with personal and social histories. Grounded in Anya’s (2016) view of identity as a sociocultural phenomenon shaped through "languaging" and Koshiba’s (2022) critique of rigid academic frameworks, our findings highlight the mismatch between academic definitions and students’ self-perceptions.

Our goal was to have heritage speakers identify who they were ethnically, culturally, and linguistically. Participants were tasked with selecting ethnic/national labels that they would use to identify themselves and explain in which situations they may use them in. The participants were encouraged to choose as many labels that they wanted from a list of 41 identity labels provided to them as well as adding any others they identify with. A total of 158 labels were provided, with some students choosing only one label and others choosing as many as eight labels. Participants were also asked to define who a heritage speaker is or can be and then explain why they would or would not use the term to refer to themselves. The definitions provided by students were generally more open-ended than many “traditional” definitions of heritage speakers, which aligns with the admission criteria used in the University’s SHL program. However, despite all the students being enrolled in SHL courses, 23 students said that they would not use the term “heritage speaker” due to perceived language limitations, lack of early exposure, even though these same students did not mention language proficiency or age of exposure in their personal definitions of “heritage speakers”.

In response, we propose a more inclusive, student-informed framework for understanding heritage speakers, emphasizing personal choice, socialization, and historical context as it relates to placement in SHL courses. Our findings have led to revisions in the SHL curriculum at the University, including increased classroom discussion on identity and the historical role of Spanish in the Southwest. This research underscores the need for researchers and educators to rethink rigid categorizations and center heritage learners’ voices in shaping educational practices.

Abstract:

¿Quién puede ser un hablante de herencia (HH)? O mejor dicho, ¿quién decide quién debe ser un HH? Las definiciones tradicionales de los HHs (e.g., Polinksy & Kagan, 2007; Valdes, 2000) asumen ciertas conexiones étnicas o que los HHs crecieron hablando una lengua minoritaria en casa. Otras definiciones más prescriptivas (e.g., Benmamoun et al. 2013; Montrul, 2008) dicen que los HHs deben tener ciertas habilidades lingüísticas o que han experimentado algo de adquisición incompleta en su lengua de herencia. 

 Sin embargo, hay definiciones más contextualizadas y abiertas también (e.g., Beaudrie & Ducar, 2005; Henderson et al., 2020; Koshiba, 2022; Wilson & Martínez, 2011) que demuestran otras realidades. Con definiciones como estas, ha sido un cambio el incluir no solamente a HHs que tengan un origen étnico específico, sino que también incluya a HHs que sientan una conexión cultural a la lengua minoritaria que han aprendido y que no prescriban ciertos niveles de proficiencia. 

En nuestra investigación, para responder la pregunta de identificar quién cuenta como HH,  hemos entrevistado a estudiantes de cuatro niveles de clases para HHs en una universidad pública en Nuevo México. Este programa para HHs permite que cualquier estudiante, que reporte haber usado el español como resultado de su conexión cultural, social o comunitaria, pueda tomar las clases para HHs. Al analizar las entrevistas, encontramos aceptación y/o resistencia hacia el uso del término “hablantes de herencia” debido a sus conexiones culturales o falta de ellas y actitudes positivas y negativas hacia estudiantes que están en las clases para HHs que no tienen ascendencia hispana. Nuestros hallazgos demuestran que las experiencias vividas de los HHs van más allá de los confines de las definiciones tradicionales y prescriptivistas anteriores. Esas definiciones no representan completamente la realidad de los estudiantes inscritos en las clases de HHs ni sus propios pensamientos sobre quién es o no es un HH. 

References: 

Anya, U. (2016). Racialized identities in second language learning: Speaking blackness in Brazil. Routledge.

Beaudrie, S., & Ducar, C. (2005). Beginning level university heritage programs: Creating a space for all heritage language learners. Heritage Language Journal, 3(1), 1–26.

Benmamoun, E., Montrul, S., & Polinsky, M. (2013). Defining an “ideal” heritage speaker: Theoretical and methodological challenges Reply to peer commentaries. Theoretical Linguistics, 39(3–4), 259–294. https://doi.org/10.1515/tl-2013-0018

Gonzales, M. D. (2005). Todavia decimos’ nosotros [los] mexicanos’: Construction of identity labels among nuevo mexicanos. Southwest Journal of Linguistics, 24(1–2), 65–78.

Henderson, M. H., Wilson, D. V., & Woods, M. R. (2020). How course level, gender, and ethnic identity labels interact with language attitudes towards Spanish as a heritage language. Hispania, 103(1), 27–42.

Koshiba, K. (2022). Between Inheritance and Commodity: The Discourse of Japanese Ethnolinguistic Identity among Youths in a Heritage Language Class in Australia. Journal of Language, Identity & Education, 21(5), 316–329. https://doi.org/10.1080/15348458.2020.1795861

Polinsky, M., & Kagan, O. (2007). Heritage Languages: In the ‘Wild’ and in the Classroom. Language and Linguistics Compass, 1(5), 368–395.

https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1749-818X.2007.00022.x

Salgado, C. D. (2020). Mexican American Identity: Regional Differentiation in New Mexico. Sociology of Race and Ethnicity, 6(2), 179–194. https://doi.org/10.1177/2332649218795193

Valdés, G. (2000). The teaching of heritage languages: An introduction for Slavic-teaching professionals. The Learning and Teaching of Slavic Languages and Cultures, 375–403.

Wilson, D. V., & Ibarra, C. E. (2015). Understanding the inheritors: The perception of beginning level students toward their Spanish as a Heritage Language program. EuroAmerican Journal of Applied Linguistics and Languages, 2(2), 85–101.

Wilson, D. V., & Martínez, R. (2011). Diversity in definition: Integrating history and student attitudes in understanding heritage learners of Spanish in New Mexico. Heritage Language Journal, 8(2), 270–288.